Wikiprogress Africa

Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Post 2015. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Post 2015. Afficher tous les articles

lundi 24 mars 2014

The Chronic Poverty Report 2014-2015: The road to zero extreme poverty

With the debate on the post-2015 development framework in full swing, the third international Chronic Poverty Report addresses one key question: what needs to be done to get to (or close to) zero extreme poverty by 2030 – the new goal for global poverty reduction?

The report is the first produced by the Chronic Poverty Advisory Network (CPAN), the successor to the Chronic Poverty Research Centre (CPRC), which produced the first two Chronic Poverty Reports. Drawing on ten years of research by the CPRC and others, and on recent policy guides from CPAN, it presents new analysis of what it takes to sustain escapes from poverty; of countries that have succeeded in tackling chronic poverty; and new projections of poverty in 2030.

It presents a tripartite challenge to the world: to get close to zero extreme poverty countries need to tackle chronic poverty, stop impoverishment and ensure that those who manage to escape from poverty sustain their escapes (the poverty ‘tripod’). It also raises the spectre that there may remain a billion people living in extreme poverty in 2030 unless existing policies are implemented robustly and new policies and political commitments are up and running by 2020.

The bulk of the report focuses on the policies needed to get to zero. While there are many such policies, any country could and should be able to generate a selection of the key policies that will work with the national grain, and the report offers a device – the impoverishment index – to help countries determine the priorities that will carry their citizens out of poverty.

lundi 9 décembre 2013

Development Co-operation Report 2013: Ending Poverty

This article by Ousmane Aly DIALLO, is part of Wikiprogress Series on the Post 2015. It highlights the main points of the recent Development Cooperation Report 2013.

The Development Co-operation Report (DCR) is the key annual reference document for analysis and statistics on trends in international development co-operation. This year, the DCR explores what needs to be done to achieve rapid and sustainable progress in the global fight to end poverty. 

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) galvanized political support for poverty reduction. The world has probably already met the MDG target of halving the share of the population living in extreme poverty (USD 1.25 per day). Yet progress towards the MDGs across countries, localities, population groups and gender has been uneven, reflecting a fundamental weakness in current approaches. As the United Nations and its partners shape a new global framework to take the place of the MDGs in 2015 , they face the urgent challenge of ending poverty once and for all. As this Development Co-operation Report (DCR) makes clear, this will take more than business as usual.

New goals for ending poverty
To recapture the Millennium Declaration’s vision, the new international development agenda must reflect principles of solidarity, equality, dignity and respect for nature. Its goals must effectively guide core aspirations, targets must be easy to monitor, and must include strategies for economic and social transformation. The report made numerous proposals for developing these elements, including:

Move from poverty to inclusive well-being
Create a new headline indicator to measure progress towards eradicating all forms of poverty, which could complement the current income-poverty indicator
Include targets and indicators to track whether people are becoming newly poor.
Include a goal of reducing income inequality, or a set of indicators of inequality across the various goals.
Take a twin-track approach to gender: a goal for gender equality and women’s empowerment coupled with a way of revealing gender gaps in all other goals and targets

Combine national and global goals and responsibilities
Base a new global goal of reducing income poverty on national poverty measures that are internationally co-ordinated and consistent.
Make the new agenda applicable to all countries, but with responsibilities that vary accordingto a country’s starting point, capabilities and resources.
Set targets nationally but within global minimum standards.

Improve data for tracking progress
Adopt a specific goal, target and indicator to increase the availability and quality of data fortracking progress towards these new goals, and invest in national statistical capacity

The report stresses the ambition and the credibility of this goal (ending poverty once for all) and as well as the importance of sound political leadership to achieve it. In Africa, during the last 13 years, the leadership of the late Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi and his 
 focus on development results, food security and poverty reduction have been exemplary. The reports highlights also the successes of Ghanaian presidents hailing from different political parties, but who have coincided in championing poverty reduction and food security for the poorest. This has enabled Ghana to implement a successful development strategy focused on building the private sector, developing human resources and implementing good governance. Furthermore

Balancing Poverty and Environmental Sustainability

While it is not always easy to balance poverty reduction with environmental sustainability, important progress is being made. Over the past decade, for instance, Brazil has greatly reduced extreme poverty and inequality while at the same time cutting deforestation by 80%. Ethiopia aims to become a middle-income country without increasing its greenhouse gas emissions and has developed the innovative Climate- Resilient Green Economy strategy to guide it in doing so.

The role of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation

The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation is just what is needed. This unique coalition of governments, civil society, the private sector and international institutions was launched at the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan in 2011. Its aim is to catalyse and co-ordinate global efforts and resources for more effective development. The Global Partnership will play a key role in helping development actors work together, discuss the pros and cons of diverse policies and instruments, share good practice, foster collaboration and promote concrete action – crucial pre-conditions for successfully implementing the post-2015 development agenda. It is up to all of us, now, to make use of this novel, inclusive partnership to improve our development co-operation efforts.

vendredi 27 septembre 2013

"Afrique au-delà de 2015" :Un débat à l'ONU sous la houlette du Maroc


A la veille de la réunion de haut niveau sur les Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement (OMD) qui aura lieu en marge de l'Assemblée générale de l'ONU à New York, un débat sur l'Afrique au-delà de 2015 s'est tenu au sein de cette instance, à l'initiative du Maroc.

Ahmed Lahlimi Alami, Haut Commissaire au Plan, Maroc

Le Maroc a organisé, mardi au siège des Nations Unies à New York, un débat sur “L'Afrique au-delà de 2015: quels objectifs pour quel modèle de développement?”, avec la participation de ministres africains, de hauts responsables onusiens, des diplomates, ainsi que des personnalités représentant les institutions financières internationales et régionales.
Tenu en marge de la 68e Assemblée générale des Nations Unies et à la veille de la réunion de haut niveau sur les Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement (OMD), ce débat s'inscrit dans le cadre de la réflexion prospective menée par le Haut commissariat au plan sur “Le Maroc 2030 dans son environnement géostratégique”.
Cette réunion a abordé l'état d'avancement de la mise en œuvre des OMD en Afrique, ainsi que l'agenda de développement au-delà de 2015, à la lumière des expériences de pays africains.
Croissance vs revenu
Le haut commissaire au plan, Ahmed Lahlimi Alami, qui a présidé les travaux de cette rencontre, a souligné que “le Maroc partage avec ses pairs africains la volonté et l'obligation de réaliser une croissance économique forte au service d'un développement humain et d'une cohésion sociale durable”.
“Plusieurs pays de notre continent peuvent se prévaloir aujourd'hui d'avoir réussi au cours de la dernière décennie à accroître le potentiel de leur croissance et à engager des processus prometteurs d'amélioration des conditions de vie de leur population et de démocratisation de leurs institutions”, a poursuivi M. Lahlimi.
“L'Afrique qui réalise l'un des taux de croissance les plus forts du monde, a le taux de revenu par tête d'habitant parmi les plus faibles de toutes les régions à travers le monde.”
AHMED LAHLIMI ALAMI, HAUT COMMISSAIRE AU PLAN.
Pour sa part, le Maroc a anticipé l'après-2015. En dix ans, le Royaume a pu réaliser une croissance forte qui a presque doublé et a investi une moyenne de 30% de sa richesse nationale pour résorber les déficits, développer les infrastructures dans l'ensemble des régions, a expliqué M. Lahlimi.
Retard dans les OMD
Quant au ministre des Affaires étrangères et de la coopération, Saad Eddine El Otmani, il a indiqué que “s'il faut se réjouir que l'Afrique ait fait des avancées importantes au niveau du développement socio-économique, le continent africain accuse toujours du retard par rapport à certains objectifs”.
M. Otmani a fait observer que le chômage des jeunes demeure un défi mondial à surmonter, en particulier au sein du continent africain où les jeunes représentent la majorité de la population.
La promotion des investissements productifs et l'amélioration de l'accès aux marchés sont des éléments essentiels à prendre en considération dans tout programme de développement pour l'après-2015, a-t-il tenu à préciser.
Et de souligner que l'agenda de développement pour l'après-2015 dépendra d'un partenariat mondial renforcé et renouvelé, en plus des moyens solides de sa mise en oeuvre, à travers notamment la définition d'objectifs mesurables et assortis de délais d'application.
Les participants à cette rencontre ont eu l'occasion d'échanger les expériences et les visions sur les rapports en Afrique entre croissance économique, progrès social et modèle de développement, dans une démarche résolument tournée vers l'avenir.
Source : aufait avec MAP

mardi 24 septembre 2013

Education is Essential for Development

This post by Pauline Rose of EFA Global Monitoring Report is part of Wikiprogress series  on 'Education and Skills'.

New analysis by the Education for All Global Monitoring Report highlights importance of equitable education

With just a few days until world leaders meet to make progress in defining the next set of development goals, theEFA Global Monitoring Report has just released new evidence showing that education transforms lives. Join us as we campaign for education to be a central part of any post-2015 global development framework that will be actively debated at this UN General Assembly.
education transforms
There are few more dramatic illustrations of the power of education than the estimate that the lives of 2.1 million children under five were saved between 1990 and 2009 because of improvements in girls’ education. Education is one of the most powerful ways of improving children’s health. Educated mothers are better informed about specific diseases, so they can take measures to prevent them. They can recognize signs of illness early, seek advice and act on it. If all women had primary education, needless child deaths would be cut by a sixth. If all women had a secondary education, child deaths would be halved.

Education has to be equitable

The link between education and economic growth is commonly recognized.  Our new analysis shows, however, that the power of education as a catalyst for this growth can only be fully realized if it is equitable. If education inequality in sub-Saharan Africa had been halved to the level of Latin America and the Caribbean, for example, the annual per capita growth rate over 2005-2010 would have been 47% higher.
Next week, there are two key meetings during the United Nations General Assembly campaigning for education to be supported in conflict-affected countries. Many organizations are joining together to support children who are still battling to go to school.  We have a moral imperative to support children like those in Syria by ensuring their education is not interrupted. Today our new analysis also confirms how indispensable an education is to strengthen the bonds that hold communities and societies together. In Latin America, the difference between a primary and a secondary education can increase tolerance towards people of a different race by 47%; in the Arab States, it can increase tolerance towards people of a different religion by 14%.

Education is key in addressing many development challenges

Education is also part of the solution to global environmental problems. By improving knowledge, instilling values, fostering beliefs and shifting attitudes, education has considerable power to change environmentally harmful lifestyles and behaviours. Education can encourage people to use energy and water more efficiently and recycle household waste. In poor countries affected by climate
change, education helps people adapt to its effects. Across 29 countries, our new analysis showed that 25% of people with less than secondary education expressed concern for the environment compared to 37% of people with secondary education and 46% of people with tertiary education.
This blog contains only a snapshot of some of the compelling new evidence our EFA Global Monitoring Report has published in time for this year’s United Nations General Assembly. I hope it will give us all renewed energy to complete what we set out to do with the goals set in Dakar in 2000, and reiterated in the Millennium Development Goals. It also gives us the arguments needed to fight for the central place of quality education for all in goals that are set after 2015.

This article originally appeared on the Education for All blog (here).

dimanche 22 septembre 2013

Revue hebdomadaire

Bonjour à tous  et bienvenue à cette revue d’articles et de rapports sur le progrès, orientés vers l’Afrique. Parmi les faits saillants de cette semaine, il y’a:

  • Le World Happiness Report,  du Réseau des solutions pour le développement durable des Nations-Unies,  qui a été publié ce 9 septembre. L’Europe du Nord a été la région la plus heureuse dans ce rapport sur le bonheur avec le Danemark et la Norvège occupant les deux premières places. L’Angola a les citoyens les plus heureux en  Afrique (61e place mondiale) et a fait les progrès les plus importants. Des 10 États les moins heureux dans le monde, 9 provenaient de l’Afrique.
  • Dr Mark Williamson, directeur de “Action for Happiness” a publié cet article sur le ProgBlog, Improving Well-Being Should Be Our Global Priority, abordant les principaux themes du rapport et la place que devrait occuper le bien-être dans l’agenda mondial.
  • Le e-learning Africa Report 2013 du gouvernement de la Namibie se base sur des enquêtes exhaustives sur l’expérience et l’opinion de professionnels de 42 pays africains. Il montre l’impact des technologies sur l’apprentissage et l’enseignement en Afrique et le plébiscite donné à l’éducation dans l’agenda de développement de l’après-2015.
  • La scolarisation peut sauver la planète. Tel est l’un des leitmotiv de l’Éducation pour tous dont les données statistiques récentes montrent l’impact de l’éducation sur différents aspects du bien-être. Ces données visuelles montrent le pouvoir transformateur de l’éducation et constituent un témoignage pour « plus d’éducation » pour l’après-2015.


Nous espérons que vous avez aimés ce survol et vous donnons rendez-vous la semaine prochaine pour un autre tour d’actualité sur le progrès et le bien-être des sociétés.

Bien à vous, dans le progrès,

Ousmane Aly DIALLO

vendredi 20 septembre 2013

Week in Review

Hello everyone and welcome to another Africa-oriented review of progress reports and articles. Among this week’s highlights were:

  •  The World Happiness Report by the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network was released on September 9th, ahead of the UN General Assembly. Northern Europe dominated the rankings of this happiness report with Denmark and Norway being respectively first and second. They were closely followed by Switzerland, the Netherlands and Sweden. Angola is the first African country and made one of the largest leap in these surveys, at the 61st place.Of the ten least-happy countries, nine are in Africa and the other is Syria.
  • The eLearningAfrica Report 2013 , commissioned by the government of Namibia, the 2013 edition is based on a comprehensive survey of the experience and opinions of professionals and practitioners from 42 African countries. It shows just how technology is affecting learning and teaching in Africa and the importance given to education in the post 2015 development agenda.
  • Schooling can save the planet. The newest data from Education for All shows the impact of education in different component of well-being. These infographics shows the power of transformation of education and pleads for more education in the post2015 development agenda.

We hope you enjoyed this review. Stay tuned the same time next week for another roundup of the week that was.

Yours in progress,

Ousmane Aly DIALLO

mardi 17 septembre 2013

Définir la place de l'éducation dans le programme de développement de l'après-2015

Ce blog, écrit par Ousmane Aly DIALLO, fait partie de la série de Wikiprogress sur l'Éducation. Il résume le nouveau rapport de l'UNICEF, Définir la place de l'éducation dans le programme de développement de l'après-2015.

Les consultations thématiques globales dans le monde ont permis de faire l’état des lieux de la place de l’éducation dans les Objectifs duMillénaire pour le développement tout en permettant la place  que les  citoyens veulent lui  donner dans l’agenda de développement de l’après-2015.

 Dans l’enquête mondiale en ligne de l’ONU, « My World », l’éducation était placée comme première priorité pour 393,000 des 600,000 participants provenant de 194 pays. 64% de ces sondés  avaient moins de 30 ans et plus de ¾ étaient issus de pays en développement[i].

Dirigée par l’UNESCO et l’UNICEF avec l’appui de gouvernements nationaux et de la Fondation William et Flora Hewlett,  ces consultations avaient pour objet général d’ « d’évaluer les avancées et les défis à relever dans le cadre de la réalisation des Objectifs du Millénaire pour ledéveloppement (OMD) relatifs à l’éducation adoptés en 2000 et des objectifs plus généraux de l’éducation pour tous (EPT), en vue de développer une vision holistique de la meilleure manière de refléter l’éducation, la formation et l’apprentissage dans le programme de l’après-2015 ».

L’équité, l’accès et la qualité de l’éducation ont été au centre des demandes des participants et cela se reflète dans la vision de l’éducation pour l’après-2015 qui se décline ainsi : « Éducation équitable de qualité et un apprentissage tout au long de la vie pour tous ». Cet objectif doit permettre à toutes les sociétés de développer les compétences, connaissances et innovations nécessaires pour relever les défis politiques, économiques, technologiques, sanitaires et environnementaux actuels et futurs et pour rester sur la voie du développement durable.

mercredi 14 août 2013

Reflecting the Realities, Needs and Priorities in Monitoring Human and Social Development in Africa Beyond 2015


This blog, by Wikiprogress Africa Co-ordinator Ousmane Aly DIALLO, is part of the Wikiprogress Series on the Wikiprogress Africa Network and on the Post-2015. This post provides a summary of UNECA’s working paper on the Post-2015  “Working Document on the New Development Indicators Reflecting the Realities, Needs and Priorities in Monitoring Human and Social Development in Africa Beyond 2015” .

With the deadline of the Millennium Development Goals coming fast ahead, most of the stakeholders are already thinking on what needs to be done after 2015 and how the MDG framework can be improved.  As one of the continent most concerned about the challenges of poverty and the well-being of its citizens, Africa is still working on a framework that will encompass all aspects of human and social development. This Working Document on the New Development Indicators Reflecting the Realities, Needs and Priorities in Monitoring Human and Social Development in Africa Beyond 2015, is part of this process.

The limited and modest progress made by African countries towards the achievement of  the MDGs is problematic. Were all the countries on the same footing at the start? Were the goals ever meant to be monitored at the national level? Besides, it somewhat conceals disparities between the different social groups and subnational regions. Considering only the national scope hides from us local and regional inequalities that must be progressively eradicated. It is to be noted in particular that the results obtained from the overall indicators are distorted as they only relate to certain categories of the population.
Progress towards the Millennium Development Goals in Africa

Inequalities and disparities within countries didn’t appear on the MDG framework which gave a distorted view of the reality. Social (ethnicities, castes) and regional (urban/rural) factors all had an impact of the social and human development of people but they weren’t necessarily captured with the national MDG progress ranking. Any new framework has to take into consideration these factors, and since the high-level panel of Eminent Persons has pledged that no one should be left behind, the African concerns are in concordance with the overall direction of the post-2015 framework.

Among the limits put forward, there’s the insufficient place given to the economy in the current MDG framework. The paper stresses the need to start from a strong and competitive economy to improve the well-being and quality of life of citizens through job creation and other targets. This vision is evident in the pyramid of “balanced development” below:


Besides this limit, there is the problem of the poor performance of Africa in regard to the Millennium Development Goals. Most of Sub-Saharan Africa is still lagging behind while the North of the continent is doing much better. This overall modest progress is attributed to several factors in this document, among other the very ambitious goals and the shortcomings in the budgetary policy choices and inefficiency in public expenditures. Despite these limits, the MDGs constitute a big step towards the well-being of people by setting different and complementary targets and pushing all states to achieve them by the end of  a specific date. With less than 1000 days remaining now, some are pushing for an extension of the MDGs while the majority suggest a slight adjustment or more radically a whole rethinking of the MDG framework.

UNECA’s African Centre for Statistics fall in the middle of this debate through their proposals for a new post-2015 framework. Indicators must be based on the development needs of countries according to the report which stresses that all African countries are working on their national development strategies and / or fight against poverty. Yet, there is insufficient convergence between African countries in the choice of indicators and that’s one of the main reasons of the indicators put forward in this document.

Development targets relevant to the African countries were thus identified and to monitor the progress into their achievements, they need to be classified depending on dimensions and the levels of government.


  • International stakeholders should deal only with a “very restrictive list of basic indicators that each country should monitor to ensure a decent living for the whole population”. Giving every citizen of the world a basic quality of life should be the aim and that was at the root of the MDGs before their expansion with uneven indicators. The current MDGs still remain relevant although some targets and indicators needs to be improved.
  • Secondary indicators that will speed up the transition to a pre-emergent stage (MDGs+) are to be monitored at the sub-regional and regional level. The current eight MDGs remain relevant as a whole but their associated targets and indicators should be better selected. Among the indicators, relevant to this level, are secondary, technical and higher education, infrastructure, macroeconomic framework, regional financial markets, regional integration policies, good governance, transfer of technology and development of internally generated knowledge.
  • Policies targeting growth and employment should be at the national level. Emergence indicators (MDGs ++) must be monitored by the states with efficient regional organizations such as ECOWAS providing backup and integrating these policies into their monitoring systems.

The different development goals were broken down into several dimensions:
  • Human dimension with indicators such as (a) access to knowledge by all; (b) gender development
  • Infrastructure dimension:  with universal access to potable water, sewerage facilities, electric­ity, ICT, housing and good transport system.
  •  Environmental dimension where the fight against pollution and the preservation of the biodi­versity can be included.
At the subregional and regional integration, an
  • Institutional dimension should be put forward with the strengthening of public institutions as  the indicator,
  • Economic dimension with  (a) a stable macroeconomic framework; (b) strong and regular growth; (c) capacity for diversification and transformation and a
  •  Social dimension with indicators such as  a) a well-fed population; (b) good health for all; (c) good social se­curity for all the vulnerable groups; (d) employment and income for all; (e) child protec­tion; (f) preservation and development of the cultural heritage.
                       
To have a broader view of all the development indicators, please go to the annex of the document (click here).

The development indicators put forward constitute a significant contribution towards the post-2015 development framework. The scope of the indicators and the different levels of government involved in their monitoring are proof enough of the ambitions of its authors. Furthermore, they echo the HLP’s call to leave no one behind in the post-2015 framework. Economic growth occupies an integral place in this proposal although other quality of life dimensions are not neglected. 

There's a clear distinction on what should be of what should be monitored at the national level and how  the international level could stimulate the progress towards development.

mercredi 31 juillet 2013

Post-2015: It's Time to Harness Diaspora Power



Growth alone is not enough. The MDGs alone are not enough. Africa needs sustainable, inclusive development and in this, the diaspora could be key.

In 2000, the UN established eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be achieved by 2015. These targets helped create a co-ordinated effort to reduce poverty across the globe, and impressive progress has been made in a number of areas.

But even if all of the eight goals and targets are met, many countries would still remain poor and underdeveloped. This is because the MDGs – as valuable as they may be – do not deal with the underlying reasons why people remain poor. Furthermore, they fail to take into account the ways in which the diaspora, who remit nearly half a trillion dollars to developing countries annually, can be harnessed to help facilitate the structural and economic transformation so crucial to sustainable development.

Nowhere are these trends more evident than in Africa. The World Bank reports that the continent is growing at an average of 5-6% annually, yet poverty levels and unemployment remain high. Meanwhile, diaspora remittances are thought to significantly outweigh Western aid.

Following China's example
As Yaw Ansu, Chief Economist at the African Centre for Economic Transformation (ACET), has pointed out, growth alone is not enough. That is why over 50 UK-based African diaspora organisations, under the Africa-UK umbrella, are pushing for a different focus for the post-2015MDG architecture. These groups take the view that international development must not focus solely on poverty reduction in line with the MDGs, but also foster wealth, drive structural reform and create employment opportunities.

Africa only has to look to the example set by countries such as China which has made one of the most impressive contributions in reducing poverty over the past 30 years but not through the MDGs. China used foreign investment and diaspora remittances to help accelerate a competitive industrial and agricultural policy, focussing on the development of infrastructure, education and skills. With the benefits of low labour costs and healthcare improvements, China was able to enjoy a dramatic economic take-off.

Whilst growth induced by commodity price rises, discoveries of natural resources or increases in foreign assistance can be significant, it is simply not sustainable without the infrastructure to support it. For Africa, this means relying less on aid and primary commodities, and more on industry, manufacturing, and knowledge-based services. It also means modernising agriculture along with upgrading skills and technological capabilities to compete in the global marketplace.

African diaspora is key

In this drive towards inclusive economic and structural transformation, the African diaspora can have an important role to play.

Take, for example, the diaspora-led social enterprise Sacoma UK which works in Kenya and Uganda to provide structural support to small-scale rural farmers. Through a combination of training, financial and technical services, this organisation works closely with communities to help prepare produce for export to a UK market. This not only helps certain rural populations earn sustainable incomes but contributes to the development of African small-holder agriculture and helps increase investment in African agribusiness.

As well as being uniquely placed to foster these kinds of partnerships, members of the diaspora can also be critical in providing additional foreign direct investment along with educated and skilled manpower.

Africa’s mobile technology boom, for example, began in part thanks to the contributions of better-known members of the diaspora such as Mo Ibrahim, who founded the telecommunications company Celtel. The growth of this sector has helped connect businesses to each other as well as rural dwellers to those in the city, providing unprecedented access to information and financial systems. It has been singled out as one of the most important tools for facilitating economic and development activity in Africa since the turn of the century. Studies on the use of mobile money services such as M-PESA, for example, suggest that rural Kenyan households using the technology have seen a rise in their incomes of 5-30%.

It is only through these kinds of transformations that Africa will be able to create enough productive jobs and impart the right skills for a modern economy, improving people’s living standards in economically balanced societies. And that calls for looking beyond short-term growth and taking a long-term perspective in setting an agenda for a sustainable economic future, something in which the diaspora can be central.

A Diaspora Ministerial Conference held in Geneva on 18 June urged the High Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda to include global diaspora alongside national governments in ‘Forging a New Global Partnership’. If Africa is to see genuine and inclusive growth, a post-2015 framework will need to incorporate these critical enablers of structural transformation as well as harness the resources of the diaspora, who must now be recognised as a global partner for development.

This blog by Onyekachi Wambu, Director of Policy and Engagement at the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD) originally appeared on the Think Africa Press website. The original post is accessible here

jeudi 18 juillet 2013

"Oui, Malala- Nous sommes à l'écoute"

Ce blog, écrit par la coordonnatrice de Wikichild, Melinda George, fait partie de la série de Wikiprogress sur le bien-être des enfants. Il traite des trois étapes nécessaires pour augmenter la participation de la jeunesse: être à l'écoute, implication dans le processus de prise de décision et dans l'implémentation de la décision.

Avez-vous déjà vu un enfant qui s’accroche aux habits de son père ou de sa mère, désirant un moment d’attention? Combien de temps cela prend avant que l’autorité ne se rende compte de la présence de l’enfant? Et combien de temps avant que cette figure, responsable du bien-être de l’enfant, ne lui réponde « Oui, mon enfant, je t’écoute », si jamais elle le dit?

Si notre objectif est d’améliorer les vies et le bien-être des enfants, alors il faudra d’abord se rendre compte de leur présence et les inclure dans les efforts que nous faisons, pour leur bien-être.

Écouter la jeunesse est le premier pas pour les impliquer davantage

Écoutons un extrait du discours de Malala Yousafzai à l'Assemblée générale des Nations-Unies





Tous les enfants ont une voix, et il nous revient d’aller vers eux et de les écouter. La semaine dernière, la jeunesse était présente à l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies pour le « Malala Day ». Cela représentait bien plus que la voix d’une jeune fille en faveur de l’éducation. Les jeunes ont toujours milité pour plus de droits et une meilleure considération depuis des siècles. La différence est que nous les entendons aujourd’hui. Nous écoutons ce qu’ils ont à dire et nous magnifions leurs efforts au niveau international, du moins de ceux qui ont accès à cette tribune. Il est nécessaire d’améliorer notre capacité d’écoute afin de recueillir les échos qui ne parviennent pas à nous.

Impliquer la jeunesse dans les processus de décision politique est la seconde étape.

Cela fait des années qu’on dit qu’impliquer la jeunesse dans les processus de décision politique est un facteur important pour générer un progrès durable. Agenda 21, un plan d’action exhaustif pour le développement durable au 21e siècle décline clairement que 30% de la population mondiale est de la jeunesse. L’implication de cette catégorie dans l’environnement, dans la prise de décision et dans l’implémentation des programmes est nécessaire pour le succès à long terme d’Agenda 21 [[1]](“youth comprise nearly 30 per cent of the world's population. The involvement of today's youth in environment and development decision-making and in the implementation of programmes is critical to the long-term success of Agenda 21” [[2]]). Cet organisme soutient qu’au-delà de leur contribution intellectuelle et de leur capacité à mobiliser autour de ce projet, les enfants et les jeunes apportent des perspectives uniques qui doivent être prises en compte. Ce rapport et ces points ont été soulignés, il y’a plus de 20 ans.

Au mois de juin, Wikichild a organisé une discussion en ligne intitulée, Comment mesurer le bien-être des enfants dans le cadre des priorités de développement? Plusieurs participants ont mentionné la nécessité d’impliquer les jeunes sur la manière de mesurer leur bien-être, et même de mettre « faire entendre sa voix » comme un indicateur.

La discussion a été lancée lors du trentenaire de HBSC où a été abordée la participation de la jeunesse, présente lors de l’évènement. Le Commissaire Écossais pour les Enfants et les Jeunes a présenté les « 7 Règles d’or pour la participation » (voyez les diapositives ci-dessous).



Durant le même évènement, des jeunes du Canada, de l’Écosse, de l’Irlande et de l’Angleterre ont présenté une vidéo détaillant leurs participations dans les processus de prise de décision. Le public, qui comprenait des experts du domaine bien-être infantile, avait de nombreuses questions sur comment la jeunesse pouvait être mieux assistée par leurs écoles, leurs parents, les agences sur la jeunesse, et par leur communauté durant leur phase adolescente. Ces très riches échanges peuvent être résumés ainsi : aidez-nous, ayez confiance en nous et demandez-nous.

Voici une contribution formulée lors de la discussion en ligne de Wikichild
 “We need to ask young people in a more systematic and constructive way. They need to be involved in the development and the implementation of well-being measures.”
- HBSC Event Participant

La troisième étape consiste à impliquer la jeunesse dans le processus d’implémentation des décisions.

Partager les responsabilités avec la jeunesse dans le processus d’application des politiques est la dernière étape de leur participation. Un rapport de « Youth Visioning for Island Living (YVIL) » soutient que les jeunes, quoique dynamiques et innovateurs, ne disposent pas des compétences et des instruments pour mettre en œuvre leurs idées[3]. Il faudrait alors les accompagner dans le processus d’acquisition de ces compétences et instruments. Atteindre ce stade demandera du temps, de la formation et des investissements, mais le jeu en vaut la chandelle.

Ces trois stades doivent être atteints, en même temps que nous recueillons les avis des jeunes afin de continuer à améliorer les moyens par lesquels ils peuvent participer à la prise de décision et à l’implémentation des programmes.

Mais avant tout…. Allez-y les jeunes, nous sommes à votre écoute.

Melinda George
Wikichild co-ordinator



[1] Agenda 21 a été établi suite à la la conference des Nations-Unies sur l’Environnement et le Développement (UNCED) qui s’est tenue à Rio de Janeiro, Brésil en 1992.
[2] Chapitre 25 de la Section III d’Agenda 21 intitulée “Children & Youth in Sustainable Development”
 [3] Supporting Youth in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Activities (following the review of the SIDS programme of action, Mauritius 2005), initiative de l’Organisation des Nations-Unies pour l’Éducation, la Science et la Culture (UNESCO).